Pages

Jump to bottom

7 comments

1 palmerskiss  Apr 9, 2014 2:13:37pm

that thing is frightening! like something out of a movie or fantasy. could well be a “game changer”

2 jhncsy  Apr 9, 2014 3:50:41pm

$250 million, huh? Actually, that’s cheaper than I expected.

3 Mentis Fugit  Apr 9, 2014 6:24:53pm

The return of the dreadnought?

4 Dark_Falcon  Apr 9, 2014 6:27:03pm

re: #3 Mentis Fugit

The return of the dreadnought?

Likely not. One or two such guns would be useful for shore bombardment, but hitting another ship moving at 30 knots would be much harder.

5 Mentis Fugit  Apr 9, 2014 8:06:59pm

Just wait until the boffins come up with guidance hardware capable of surviving the “firing” acceleration. WW2 eggheads could build proximity fuzes based on pre-solid-state radar technology into an anti-aircraft artillery shell, after all. Drop a “shell” close enough to the target and only small corrections will be needed.

6 BishopX  Apr 9, 2014 8:25:40pm

So it’s a gun that fires a solid dart (not explosive) which costs $25,000 per round. Probably a great value proposition against an actual naval vessel (assuming they can hit it) or tanks. Not so great at anything else…

7 goddamnedfrank  Apr 9, 2014 11:32:05pm

re: #5 Mentis Fugit

Just wait until the boffins come up with guidance hardware capable of surviving the “firing” acceleration. WW2 eggheads could build proximity fuzes based on pre-solid-state radar technology into an anti-aircraft artillery shell, after all. Drop a “shell” close enough to the target and only small corrections will be needed.

Surviving the acceleration might turn out to be the easy part, since the firing process will put such circuitry dead center of an extreme EMP event.

re: #6 BishopX

So it’s a gun that fires a solid dart (not explosive) which costs $25,000 per round. Probably a great value proposition against an actual naval vessel (assuming they can hit it) or tanks. Not so great at anything else…

The cost might reflect the current prototyping phase, before production economy of scale kicks in. It looks like the projectile assembly requires a lot of machining at super tight tolerances to make the entire thing fit and conduct as a single unit, holding together until it exits the gun and the sabot separates from the dart, but even still $25K per unit seems high once you get past R&D costs.

re: #4 Dark_Falcon

Likely not. One or two such guns would be useful for shore bombardment, but hitting another ship moving at 30 knots would be much harder.

I looked up the time of flight for the 16 inch guns on the Iowa class battleship:

Time of flight for AP Shell with MV = 2,500 fps (762 mps)
10,000 yards (9,140 m): 13.2 seconds
20,000 yards (18,290 m): 29.6 seconds
30,000 yards (27,430 m): 50.3 seconds
36,000 yards (32,920 m): 66.1 seconds
40,000 yards (36,580 m): 80.0 seconds

Time of flight for HC Shell with MV = 2,615 fps (797 mps)
10,000 yards (9,140 m): 13.1 seconds
20,000 yards (18,290 m): 30.3 seconds
30,000 yards (27,430 m): 53.2 seconds
35,000 yards (32,000 m): 70.3 seconds
39,500 yards (36,120 m): 86.0 seconds

Now figure that this railgun will be firing a projectile with a better ballistic coefficient nearly 3 times the velocity, with a max range over 4 times greater. It will also have much greater rate of fire (projected 12 rounds per minute) and be doing this in an era with modern radar and drones to correct trajectory.

I agree that we probably won’t see battleships ever again, but I’m guessing that networking together a bunch of smaller ships armed with these will fill the same role and then some.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh